We talk of change, of becoming different, better, more self-actualized humans; but in our very essence do we, can we, change? Our nature is to become comfortable, content and static; fearing and avoiding change, minute or otherwise. We loudly bray our new-found knowledge and insight when struck with adversity or epiphany and yet does the core ever evolve? How limited are we by our genetic inherent heritage?
True evolution cannot exist in the individual, the single, the "one" state. Its elegance lies in the fact that there must be different and alternate, opposite and complimentary, commingling input to effect change, evolution, true morphing... so what we change is the phenotype, the expression, the outward appearance but that is not reliable, can only be upheld for discreet periods until the essence re-emerges as the un-evolved genotype.
Modification is what we mean, awareness and communication are the purveyors of the intent.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
1 comment:
Nano users to sue Apple?
Nano owner Jason Tomczak and others have filed a class-action law suit against Apple in California, to get their money back for a product they claim suffers "excessive scratching" during normal usage.
Very interesting and attention getting blog, could I tell a friend? I really enjoy this stuff, mind if I come often? Anyway, thanks for making such a great blog, I'll be back to make a contribution.
my site: womens rash guards (nothing special)
~ bye
keep up the good work!
Post a Comment